New York judge rules that vaping is not smoking
A New York judge handed a victory to <g class="gr_ gr_9 gr-alert gr_spell ContextualSpelling" id="9" data-gr-id="9"><g class="gr_ gr_9 gr-alert gr_spell ContextualSpelling" id="9" data-gr-id="9">vapers</g></g> Feb. 5, declaring vaping is not the same as smoking and e-cigarette use is not necessarily banned in all the same places as smoking.<br />
<br />
“An electronic cigarette neither burns nor contains tobacco,” said the court. “Instead, the use of such a device, which is commonly referred to as ‘vaping,’ involves the inhalation of vaporized e-cigarette liquid consisting of water, nicotine, a base of propylene glycol or vegetable glycerin and occasionally, flavoring.”<br />
<br />
The issue was brought to the court in the case of People v. <g class="gr_ gr_11 gr-alert gr_gramm Punctuation only-del replaceWithoutSep" id="11" data-gr-id="11">Thomas,</g> after <g class="gr_ gr_13 gr-alert gr_spell ContextualSpelling" id="13" data-gr-id="13">vaper</g> Shawn Thomas was issued a citation on the subway and subsequently challenged the citation in cou