January 2009

<div style="text-align: justify;">Jeremy Clarkson of London’s <i>Sunday Times</i> calls for David Cameron to overturn the smoking ban.</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">&hellip; that proves something! This piece published by the <i>National Post</i> (Canada) is a typical example of good and logical reasoning&nbsp;proceeding from a tragically wrong assumption.</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">The political hacks who infest our state houses continue to try to balance their bloated budgets by getting tough with smokers.</div>

<div style="text-align: justify">Antismoking pharma-trash tries (and fails) to suppress political speech, activates press marionettes &mdash;&nbsp; Read more inside…</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">A fake cigarette!</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">It sounds just, it sounds fair, it sounds egalitarian and exciting, but it&rsquo;s a trap &ndash; yet another trap.</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">A Federal Judge in Louisville, KY has dismissed a challenge to the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement between the states and 19 tobacco product manufacturers saying there’s no legal basis for attacking the compact.</div>

<div style="text-align: justify;">If smoking is the &quot;cause of cancer&quot; everyone with cancer must be a smoker.</div>

<p style="text-align: justify;">We’re not kidding. Some researchers actually published a study warning that thinking is a health risk, because it can lead to obesity.</p>

<div style="text-align: justify;">Death by medicine.</div>