<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 8pt;">It was widely predicted that bans on smoking in personal autos when children are present would lead to bans in parents’ own homes. Personal choice and rights are irrelevancies to the anti-smoking mind-set. Blogger Michael Siegel, MD, has no problem admitting that guardians of property rights "told him so."</span></p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 8pt"><img alt="" hspace="4" align="left" vspace="4" src="https://www.forces.org/userfiles/video_button.jpg" /></span><span style="font-size: 8pt">Those who are involved in the fight against tobacco prohibition and against smoking bans know that the dangers of passive smoking are a fantastic exaggeration and fraud.</span></p>
<p align="justify">As has happened before, the tobacco contraband market is going stratospheric in Canada, carrying along loads of teens in particular. These youngsters are not the fools that tobacco control cons take them for.</p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 8pt;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="left" src="https://www.forces.org/userfiles/video_button.jpg" alt="" /></span><span style="font-size: 8pt;">Phil Williams comments on the latest false representation of the British government on the statistical junk science it has embraced to justify its smoking bans. Although the studies’ results are substantially and technically "statistically insignificant," and utterly meaningless in real terms, when a number are piled together by meta-analysis, <em>le voilà</em>, they become "significant" bases for real-world tyranny.</span></p>
<p>Two pieces of good news in Oregon and Indiana, both suggesting that people are rejecting tobacco control and its speical-interest agendas.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;">Just put this through your head, you bastard smokers: you will not escape us, we have the technology.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 8pt;">‘Smoke rebel Hamish Howitt has become the first licensee to be convicted of flouting the smoking ban.’ We have a new hero in the world.</span></p>
<p>Well, really, this is not the greatest antismoking epidemiological trash, but it is certainly the latest uncritically published by the ‘public health’ BBC lackey.</p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-size: 8pt"><img alt="" hspace="4" align="left" vspace="4" src="https://www.forces.org/userfiles/video_button.jpg" /></span>Why does the government refuse to consider air filtration? Because it goes against their social engineering and pharmaceutical agenda, that’s why!</p>
<p>In the long run the phony anthropogenic climate change confidence racket may rescue true science from the corruption inflicted upon it by power-mad politicians and greedy special interest groups.</p>