|
FORCES International WHO: World Health Oppression -- Yet another fight against corruption -- Return to main page
 t must be said that for about 25 years the WHO has tried to achieve a firm control on tobacco. However, because of tobacco's immense economic importance, the member nations were lukewarm about the effective implementation of tobacco control measures.
Moreover, the anti-tobacco cartel had not yet gained momentum and finances sufficient to tip the hand of the WHO itself, so its propaganda and falsified information about tobacco, smoking, and smokers went mostly unheard.
All that has changed now. The United States, Canada, Australia, and other countries have been permeated by the cartel, which has now achieved firm control over the various departments of health, and especially over the public money-dispensing machinery.
In 1998 the cartel was successful in planting Gro Harlem Brundtland in the" Direktorat" of the organization. Mainly because of the political and financial support of the fanatically anti-smoking US administration, Gro Harlem Brundtland managed to wedge the anti-tobacco agenda ahead of the real epidemics the WHO is supposed to take care of, and obtain the allocation of sizeable funding to the anti-tobacco agenda.
So the powerful anti-tobacco industry now has control over this authoritative organization.
The fight against scientific and moral corruption has now become truly global.
The WHO's global anti-tobacco agenda is to rush all member nations into an agreement that is legally binding, and that forces the member nations to start a systematic persecution of smokers under the pretense of "helping them," while forcing huge taxation on the victims of this persecution.
The "help-the-smokers" pre-emptive move is eminently important because it provides moral and political justification for the actions of the executioners of truth and freedom, labels scientific opposition as tobacco industry lobbying, and nullifies the objections of smokers.
In fact, those objections will be perceived as coming from people "who are addicted victims of the tobacco industry, and must be helped," -- thus what those "victims" say or do cannot be regarded as a matter worthy of consideration, but simply as a manifestation of their disease. This creates a perception very much like the one of a nurse working in a psychiatric hospital, who knows not to take seriously what the patient says and to proceed with the cure regardless of the patient's willingness to take it. It is also perfectly legitimate to punish the patient who refuses the cure. And we all know what the admission to a psychiatric hospital does to the reputation of a sane person.
By using propaganda lies to convince smokers that they are sick, and using the resistance offered by those smokers who refuse to swallow the propaganda as a demonstration of their addiction to a product legally offered by the tobacco industry, the perpetrators will deflect any outrage that may arise against them towards that industry, clearing themselves from any backlash and furthering, unpunished, their agenda of control.
This totally irresponsible -- actually, criminal -- and deliberate formulation preamble is extremely dangerous and insidious, and it is now at the foundations of the anti-tobacco cartel's political presentation. It was first implemented in Canada by the British Columbia Ministry of Health to deflect any rational objection to the persecution of smokers and to the looting of the tobacco industry.
With an almost regal contempt directed to those suspected of "not supporting health" the WHO will exert tremendous pressure and will embarrass reluctant countries, so that they cave in and implement a policy of prohibition and taxation, while allowing the WHO and its partners to interfere with and even coordinate the internal affairs of those countries.
The fatal error that the member countries will probably make is to go along -- for political reasons and even if not convinced -- with an agenda that is based on scientific fraud while hoping to stall and delay, waiting for political winds to change in the West. But in the meantime, the pharmaceutical multinationals and the interests they represent will have installed themselves and the anti-tobacco cancer, with all the social, political, and economic devastation it carries, will be unstoppable.
Strong political opposition must be directed towards unmasking this world-size fraud. Not for the first time, a powerful and paternalistic health establishment is seeking inappropriate social and political control in the belief that its ideas represent the only rational and legitimate perspective on progressive human governance. Through the WHO they seek to extend this vision through "globalization" of health policy. In other words, they want power and they want it NOW. But, as the WHO itself says, prevention is better than cure -- and a campaign of education and information, coupled with legal mechanisms to curb politically unhealthy behaviours, could turn the tides.
To see the tremendous dangers for personal choice and freedom of speech and expression that the WHO scheme represents click here to jump to the bottom of this page, and link to a WHO document.
QUOTE: "Specific protocols to be agreed within the convention will address cigarette pricing policies, antismuggling measures, advertising and promotion (including promotion on the internet), and cigarette labelling."
Notice the reference to the Internet. The anti-tobacco cartel's successful effort to control media information on tobacco in certain countries did not work for the Internet because of its global nature. By pressuring all the governments of the world to participate in the persecution of tobacco, the WHO and the cartel it represents intend to control the only media where voices of dissent can be heard at a planetary level. By delegating the control of the Internet servers to the member nations, the WHO will be able to effectively eliminate not just the promotion of tobacco, but especially the exposure of the frauds that the WHO itself promotes. Sites like FORCES will be silenced or restricted because perceived as tobacco-promoting sites. Another important side effect will be the elimination of the free flow of that freedom-oriented mentality that tends to support personal choice. As is the case in most of the Unites States media, dissenters will have no voice and will be unaware of each other's activities, thus fragmenting and eventually losing significance and disappearing.
Such intrusions are all the more worrying in the context of the WHO's partnership with the pharmaceutical industry, described in this WHO document:
QUOTE: "The Project provides a model which can provide a basis for future partnerships with the private sector in other important health areas."
Now, just remember that anything affects health, especially behaviour, and the picture of what abuses lie in store for us. And the picture becomes blood-chillingly clear.
|
