FORCES - ESSAYS AND
ARTICLES
From FORCES Canada
ARCHIVE 6
Articles logged from July to November, 1999
» " No, this isn't about health. » It's about CONTROL. » It's about imposing a mandatory, laboratory-approved, elitist-commanded lifestyle on everyone. » It's about removing choice and freedom. If the law has to be undermined and science corrupted in the process, so be it. In the anti-smoking fanatic's mind, "it's for the children."
Once the antismoking scam will be finally revealed at mass level, and anti-tobacco will inevitably take the historical way of alcohol prohibition, the anti-smoking movement will go down in history as the perpetrator of the greatest, most successful fraud in the history of mankind. And the gullibility of the public and politicians, as well as the ability of institutions to systematically deceive the people they are supposed to "protect" will be the lessons the future generations will learn - way more than this 'scientific' fraud intended.
When the RIGHTS of anyone, individual or industry, are abrogated we all lose. Is the Government, and those who provided the 'evidence', so afraid of its tenuousness that they can't risk having it put under the light in court? The truly frightening part is, these are the people who make the decisions that affect the lives of every resident of this Province, and purport to have the 'best interests of the children' at heart.
"I have not met a single hospitality manager in B.C. who is really planning to ban smoking in their premises." The public health/WCB solution to protect hospitality workers from nothing is to set up a toll-free snitch line - funded by the taxpayer of course. Nothing like stirring up civil unrest and workplace problems as an economic stimulant. These people are trespassing on private property, and usurping the decision-making rights of owners of hospitality establishments - on a fraudulent basis. There is absolutely no scientific proof whatsoever to support their contention that it's necessary to protect workers from secondhand smoke: 1. Environmental
Protection Agency - ETS Fraud, USA Court Verdict Furthering the 'Smoke-Free Canada' agenda is not part of the Workers Compensation Board mandate. It's time for a review of the personnel in charge of this public entity.
It can only be hoped that the court will not take 'dictation' from unprincipled legislators willing to undermine the foundation of the legal system in order to shore up a failing economy.
FORCES Canada posted an article in November 1998 regarding this Guilty if B.C. says you're guilty, and now the time has come to determine if the B.C. Government has indeed the authority to grant itself the power to both "accuse and judge" at the same time. The unmitigated arrogance of a government in commandeering this type of power should send a warning shot across the bows of every 'industrial ship' in this nation.
For those of you who may consider the scenario unreal, remember that only a few years ago the idea of anyone being forbidden to have a cigarette in a bar was laughable. Unfortunately, we have a number of 'mules' ready to join the 'team', waiting impatiently to be harnessed.
Courage is one thing this particular candidate has more than his share of. Taking on the current 'powers-that-be' in Canada's first regional smoking PROHIBITION test area (so-called 'clean air' bylaw) has cost this gentleman enormous stress, aggravation, and resulted in the loss of his job. He's since declared his intention to run for the Mayor of Saanich (on Vancouver Island) - Esquimalt's loss. What he doesn't lack is principles, determination, integrity, and volunteers to help with his campaign. Once elected, he'll provide more 'clean-air' in that part of this Country than some folks bargained for.
The Government will no doubt welcome the additional 'tax' by way of fines that they'll collect, but it's doubtful they'll make many electorate 'points' with this cynical effort to protect the workers' health. Some workers however, may find themselves in need of a very real kind of protection should this company-snitch situation materialize.
"We've had a huge response rate; we're thrilled," said Michael Levy, senior vice-president of research and development for Glaxo Wellcome Inc. in Mississauga." Well I guess so. Any drug company would be 'thrilled' with that addition to their bottom line. Read the rest of the article and find out if you want to be a contributor to it.
Well Dr. Taylor, perhaps you should tell that to the businesses owners who've closed down or are on the verge of bankruptcy in California and the Capital Regional District of British Columbia where rigorous public smoking bans have been implemented. You might also want to alert employees who now find themselves trying to exist on drastically reduced hours or 'employment' insurance. Stick to medicine Dr. Taylor - as an economist, you leave a lot to be desired.
To combat 'air rage', and help those poor 'suffering' smokers, this group of nonthinkers wants Canadian airline companies to offer pharmaceutical DRUGS to passengers who smoke. This one's a no-brainer. For airline passengers who don't smoke (or drink) and are naturally bad-tempered and obstreperous, step right up and get your PROZAC. Don't worry -be happy -enjoy your trip in a fog, compliments of your friendly 'flavour-of-the-month' lobby group and their cohorts. If Transport Canada buys this one, we're ready to join that 'lost' continent of Atlantis.
The comment at the end of this article in the National Post Newspaper, by Dr. John Luik, succinctly sums up what this issue is REALLY all about: "At the end of the day, the most important issue at stake today is not whether people can smoke in Toronto restaurants, but whether the city is prepared to base public policy on junk science. The wonderful thing about science is that in the midst of all the subjective cut and thrust of the public policy process, it provides one of the few reasonably objective measures of what is true. By allowing junk science to pass as genuine science and provide the basis for social regulations on smoking or anything else, we not only devalue science but risk losing our single most valuable resource in the public policy process." When does the war on obesity start with the 'scientific fact' that fat people use up more than their fair share of oxygen? Of course there'll be myriad supporting studies, whose conclusions were determined in advance, that will prove that those of approved weight are being deprived of this essential element by their overweight peers. There's nothing like fomenting social unrest and hatred in the name of public health. When lies are accepted in order to advance an agenda on one issue, you can expect the same thing to apply on others.
However, chosen they were and they aren't taking this 'lying down'. The businesses signatory to the OPEN LETTER link above are NOT all dependent on the custom of smokers. The owners of these establishments recognize the loss of autonomy inherent in the CRD 'clean air' bylaw, and probably wonder which sector of private enterprise is going to be 'hit' next by public health. Congratulations to the courageous people who placed their name, and money, on this advertisement in the Victoria Times Colonist Newspaper.TOURISTS please take note; these are places you'll be comfortable with should you for some strange reason 'find' yourself on southern Vancouver Island. Civic elections in British Columbia will take place in November 1999. Help the Victoria Freedom of Choice Coalition eliminate incumbents in the running who voted for the implementation of a bylaw which places their lives and businesses in the hands of public health officials - who seemingly aren't accountable to anyone. Victoria Freedom of Choice Coalition If this complete ban on public smoking is successful here, think again if you don't feel it could happen where you live.
In November, 25% of the population - not including those who don't smoke but value their freedom - will have the opportunity of divesting themselves of civic politicians who allowed themselves to be swayed by an agenda based on spurious evidence presented by anti-tobacco fanatics. A Provincial election will allow the same opportunity. When the slate has been swept clean - it'll be time to do some housecleaning in the public health department. Member of the Victoria Freedom of Choice Coalition continue to fight with tremendous courage. A successful injunction against a business could result in 5 years jail time, business closure, fines........They necessarily put the onus where it rightfully belongs when it comes to enforcement of the so-called 'clean air' bylaw - on the people who brought it to you (CRD) and SMOKERS. Telephone (250 360-1450) or fax (250 360-1504) the CRD Enforcement line and let them know what you think.
Now pregnant women are supposed to listen to your sermon from the mount about nicotine therapies? Think again OMA. You really haven't "come all that far" - baby ......(quoting an old cigarette advertisement)
For those who need a history lesson on past anti-tobacco fanaticism these two links will be informative, as wellas an eye-opener.
FORCES' Evidence base has included information for some time regarding this, for both Alzheimer's and Parkinson's sufferers. How long is it going to be before the veil is lifted on those 'dangers' of secondhand smoke? See the World Health Organization-IARC Study on ETS. The smokefree Canada agenda would then stand revealed for what it really is - an all out bid for control of the individual and his/her legal lifestyle choices. For those who wish to submit to pharmaceutical experiments for protection against Alzheimer's/Parkinson's, enhance cognition, .........we're sure you'll find some 'suitably' funded research team to assist you. The rest of us will just keep on smoking, relaxing, and enjoying life in our own way - after all, this is still a free Country......isn't it?
|