Further Information

A case-control study of lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke among nonsmoking women living in Shanghai, China | Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Gao Y, Jin F
Article Published: 1999

Risk: RR= 1.1 (0.7-1.7) from CALEPA 2004, Table 7.2B
Type: Case-Control
Funding Source: see further information
Significance: Not Statistically Significant Positive

Published By: Cancer Causes Cont., 1999;10(6):607-16

Further Information


This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.  The authors thank Dr James Hanley, Dr Marie-Élise Parent, and Dr Jean-François Boivin for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.  Dr Goldberg gratefully acknowledges receipt of a National Health Scholar award from the National Health and Research Development Program of Health Canada and support from the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec.  The work was conducted in the Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. 


FORCES is supported solely by the efforts of the readers. Please become a member or donate what you can.

Contact Info
Forces Contacts
Media Contacts
Evidence Categories
Quick Look-Up
List of Methodological Errors in ETS Studies
Hill's Criteria and Authoritative Citations
What Must an Epidemiologic Study Warrant?
Table of All Studies on ETS and Lung Cancer up to 2006

Pie Charts of ETS/Lung Cancer Studies
How many cigarettes must be smoked to create an ETS danger?

Passive Smoking: an Institutional Problem
A 13-minute video to understand the fraud

If you like to read rather then listen, download
Now available for free