Search the Scientific Evidence database
You are currently inside the
Official Reports on Passive Smoking
area of the Scientific Evidence Portal
From the ETS sections as well as the Ethics and Policies sections it is crystal-clear that the dangers of passive smoking are a fabrication based on unethical statistical methodology. Why, then, public health authorities endorse that fabrication to the point of prohibition and enormous propaganda budgets? Can’t they read? Are they that incompetent? No, they are not; but they see the passive smoking issue as an essential tool to create a more and more hostile social environment for the smoker, so that he quits active smoking that, they believe, “causes” so many deaths and diseases. It is incontrovertible that the top health authorities of the world, through the official reports below, want to create that environment. It is equally incontrovertible that those authorities have made the conscious decision to turn to fraud and misrepresentation to eradicate a time-honoured habit for which they cannot scientifically prove one fatality. This section therefore represents the twilight between junk science and ideology.
Full 'Official Reports on Passive Smoking' category Scientific Evidence Listing (9 documents)
The Rand Study, Smoking bans do not decrease the number of Heart Attacks!
Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking
The testimony y Jane E. Gravelle senior on the health effects of environmental tobacco smoke
CRS Report for Congress - Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk
OHEA-C-361 - Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders
Requested review of OHEA document on Passive Smoking Health Risk Assessment
Secondhand Smoke: Review of evidence since 1998
Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders
The 2006 Surgeon General Report - The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke
Showing results 0 to 9 of 9
